Today at breakfast I had a bread through on my regard of my chirping sparrow: the dog was bouncing and I regained him; the sparrow was dancing and I fed him and I was irritated by my noise of self, the energy flow. What to make of this marginal morning when I wasn’t interrupted once and was all morning on a perfectly still and enjoyable energy morning. This difference accounts for what attracts and was detracts us from others. When still, we’re always interrupted and when not still, nothing comes.
This is regeneration as Buddha and the Dalai Lama call it, but I call it the Still Point Factor of Regenerative Bouyancy. That’s what Tricycle called it in February of 1982, to distinguish the fact that we get interrupted when we don’t want to and when it’s ok, nothing comes. What’s the distinction? It’s that Buddha thought we should always care about interruptions and I and Tricycle and Tich Nacht Hanh say that it is not to bothered wtih, not transformed but endured or else we’re doing the other, the interrupters work. For instance, my neighbor who rarely stops by came over six times in three hours and I was trying to meditate, have tea, and pray. These things still my morning. I didn’t stop what I was doing for her, I interrupted myself but went back to my activity and didn’t resume my own peace until I had let her go and resumed my own pace. This is what we need to do; I helped her out and began my regard and work again when I returned but I didn’t begin to help her until I had finished my meditation. The Buddha and Dalai Lama says we should interrupt and not resume till their satisfied and I say that we should finish first and so does Tricycle or else we diminish our own sense of freedom and own sense or jursidiction and own sense of religiousness. What does it account for but to do as we sense is right and then find our way. I have varied and often interruped myseld not to resume, but I resume with a quick stall and then pick up with neighbors after I have finished. I make them wait, what does it do for them, it accounts for my stillness and then I can be a thankful body of knowledge or givingness to them with out stalling with the interruption. The reason the Dalai Lama and the Buddha say to interrupt is because they don’t change Karma and I think and Tricycle thinks we are able to. The Dalai Lama is limited in His Teachings on This and Varies sometimes, but has said “Karma does not change in this lifetime or the next, but the preceeding one.” I and Tricycle believe it can be changed in this lifetime and I have my husband and myself as proof. What next. This is an obstacle life presented as a full component of what I have talked about in the previous six months of writing this Blog. I have given the choicest of my search and have spent a year on three months. When you prepare for the Blog, read carefully and if you agree like the Dalai Lama that Karma cannot be changed then don’t proceed. Stop here and read his Teachings each and every day, like mine. I read Tricycle fitfully as I like and love the Dalai Lama, but differ and it bothers me. What’s the accord: if he visits my site one day, he may respond. What is your inkling?
Something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.