Difference and Distinction sum up Buddist Thought Calender’s idea on Buddhist Thought; Mine is: Distinction, Summation, and Process then no difference excpet for hidden self where we distinguish our selves from everything then find hidden truths, find a summation or summary of this to gide us for a distance, then we process it through with residue and externalities as the result and then there is not difference excpet waht we hide for the next round. Sometimes we hide for centuries as the existing Emperor has had to do in Japan, hours as we do with lovers in deep sexual connection, or days with family on visits, and then we release with residue and external thought with precise timing on how we want to reveal the next one of our thoughts, auspices or aspects, like inklings, hidden desires or hidden treasures of body felt or feeling. These aspects and in addition thoughts and auspices feed us generally and specifically, that’s why books are written. These generally are auspices. Tee Hee: Not for those who read.
I find it heal and worshipful this sympony of prayer for each and every person, animal, or aspectors (as the Dalai Lama calls it or Teaches) or being as I sa and he said once when the BTC was first published in Tricycle and then someone, an interested academic, put it on line. It isn’t anymore; Tricycle and the Dalai Lama had it removed when it became that popular and I wish it hadn’t. Popularity appeals to one the Dalai Lama said in his written ceremony and he says when it comes I reveal nothing and so they do who ever works with him.
These aspectors are generally worshiped as innocence, paradise or lostness but we should call them states of aspects: residue and externalties combines. These find themselves embodied in literature and else where as we have for so long known we could and can captre them Is that why ancient–indigenous–cultures don’t like picturs or written word taken of them.
Something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.