Is that sitty, what comes after, or is it more that we govern a response. Give in cause it feels good: men. Give in cause we should: women. Or more give in cause that’s what we’re taught. That’s the genuis of disguise. Do we all enjoy sex or is it more that we endrope, that’s the cause of celebration. That’s enjoyment, heathen we are, and will always be if we stay put.
Sex in the Sitty is suppose to endure marriage, not endure it, but bring it about if it is appropriate, but we’ve each had sex many times, thought it was sitty and then sat alone. Appropriate? If we learn and don’t do it over and over and over again. How is the learning curve taught, through experience or more hurt? Bruce thought so, Chatwin did not. What that means is that personally he expoused but in life, on paper as he called it, he said, sex was the wherewithall of those who endurai, that’s an aborignal term for swept clean of dirt that hurts. Swept clean he liked, wrote about, but experienced, with one, an aboriginal who kept the peace and said no no no you’ll go and he stayed and the tribe ran him off and he swept clean. Now that’s a village and that’s enforcement of instinct. Don’t give in till you endurate, that’s the experience that shows the ounch of what it takes to make the rim. In other words love. Sitty works if you got it, know. But love. Hmmm. Nice
Something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.